AfricanLII at the eLearning Conference in Dar es Salaam

22 November 2011 · AfricanLII

AfricanLII were invited to participate in a workshop coordinated by LexUM at the 6th International eLearning conference in Dar es Salaam.

The eLearning conference is the largest ICT conference in Africa with 1702 participants this year from over 90 countries from Africa and beyond.

AfricanLII's participation was premised on the results of the Global Study on Free Access to Law (a study sponsored by the IDRC and OSI). The question for the purposes of this workshop was: how can the learnings from this study be applied more broadly to the education and health sectors?

Also participating in the workshop were Robert Kirunda who spoke about the study's findings on ULII and Esther Onchana who spoke about Kenya Law Reports' response to the challenge of digitising the non-digital Kenyan judicial environment. I spoke about online tools for professional communities, covering the structured (wikis, scuttle sites, screencasts, forums, freedomtoaster) and the unstructured (facebook, twitter and skype). The coordinators, Ivan Mokanov and Isabelle Moncion spoke about CanLII's experience.

Overall a very well organized conference with fascinating presentations on innovations in the education and health sectors.

AfricanLII

About the author

Recent articles by AfricanLII

Inaugural meeting and conference of African Network of Judicial Trainers

24 January 2024
AfricanLII

The work of the Judicial Institute for Africa (Jifa) and the African Legal Information Institute (AfricanLII) was showcased at this week’s inaugural three-day AGM and conference of the African Network of Judicial Trainers (ANJT), held in Zanzibar. A number of important projects were launched or unveiled at the event, including an inaugural project to draw up a shared ethics manual on judicial training for trainers.

Pocket Law: Legal Information In Your Pocket

23 January 2023
AfricanLII

Do your users struggle to connect to the Internet? Pocket Law lets you search for cases and legislation off-line. It is a USB stick loaded with an LII website, which works off-line and updates with new content once users are in Internet coverage.

Pocket Law

23 January 2023
AfricanLII

The Community Land Act in Kenya Opportunities and Challenges for Communities

15 December 2021
AfricanLII

Kenya is the most recent African state to acknowledge customary tenure as producing lawful property rights, not merely rights of occupation and use on government or public lands. This paper researches this new legal environment. This promises land security for 6 to 10 million Kenyans, most of who are members of pastoral or other poorer rural communities. Analysis is prefaced with substantial background on legal trends continentally, but the focus is on Kenya’s Community Land Act, 2016, as the framework through which customary holdings are to be identified and registered. A main conclusion is that while Kenya’s law is positive and even cutting-edge in respects, legal loopholes place communities at risk of their lands not being as secure as promised ahead of formalization, and at risk of losing some of their most valuable lands during the formalization process. This is mainly due to overlapping claims by the national and local government authorities. Political will to apply the law is also weak. The truism that the law is never enough on its own to secure social change is illustrated. With or without legal protection, the assistance of non-state actors will be needed to help communities secure their lands under formal collective entitlements. The need for judicial interpretation of disputed legal provisions may also be required to ensure new constitutional principles are delivered.

Kenya and Botswana: why were their recent sodomy judgments so different?

2 March 2020
AfricanLII

In this post from the website of the International Association of Constitutional Law , blogger Aditendra Singh of the National Law University, Delhi, compares two similar cases from Kenya and Botswana. He poses the question: What made the courts adjudicate the matters so differently?